<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Open Source Geek</title>
	<atom:link href="http://opensourcegeek.org/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://opensourcegeek.org</link>
	<description>Days in the life of an aging, open source geek</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 19:19:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Hypervisor Shootout by admin</title>
		<link>http://opensourcegeek.org/2009/11/23/hypervisor-shootout/comment-page-1/#comment-129</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 19:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://opensourcegeek.org/?p=266#comment-129</guid>
		<description>tman - thanks for letting me know about that !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tman &#8211; thanks for letting me know about that !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hypervisor Shootout by tman</title>
		<link>http://opensourcegeek.org/2009/11/23/hypervisor-shootout/comment-page-1/#comment-116</link>
		<dc:creator>tman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 22:49:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://opensourcegeek.org/?p=266#comment-116</guid>
		<description>One correction - Proxmox VE absolutely has snapshots. It uses lvm for the backend.  The snapshots have to be done via the qemu command line.  Its under the &quot;Monitor&quot; tab on the web interface.  To take a snapshot, type &quot;savevm &quot;.  To load a snapshot, type &quot;loadvm &quot;.  In my experience, the snapshot save/restore mechanism is faster than other Hypervisors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One correction &#8211; Proxmox VE absolutely has snapshots. It uses lvm for the backend.  The snapshots have to be done via the qemu command line.  Its under the &#8220;Monitor&#8221; tab on the web interface.  To take a snapshot, type &#8220;savevm &#8220;.  To load a snapshot, type &#8220;loadvm &#8220;.  In my experience, the snapshot save/restore mechanism is faster than other Hypervisors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hypervisor Shootout by Horace Rapin</title>
		<link>http://opensourcegeek.org/2009/11/23/hypervisor-shootout/comment-page-1/#comment-66</link>
		<dc:creator>Horace Rapin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 17:33:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://opensourcegeek.org/?p=266#comment-66</guid>
		<description>Great article, thank you for writing about this. You have a lot of informative articles here, thanks again! I found a &lt;a href=&quot;http://qalibrary.com/testing/a-brief-primer-on-software-testing&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;brief primer on Software Testing&lt;/a&gt;, do you think it is any good? I&#039;m curious about such introductory articles for someone who is thinking about getting into Testing. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.qalibrary.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Visit my site if you&#039;d like to read more&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article, thank you for writing about this. You have a lot of informative articles here, thanks again! I found a <a href="http://qalibrary.com/testing/a-brief-primer-on-software-testing" rel="nofollow">brief primer on Software Testing</a>, do you think it is any good? I&#8217;m curious about such introductory articles for someone who is thinking about getting into Testing. <a href="http://www.qalibrary.com" rel="nofollow">Visit my site if you&#8217;d like to read more</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Give Google a Break by Give Google a break &#124; Open Source Geek&#160;&#124;&#160;Open Hacking</title>
		<link>http://opensourcegeek.org/2009/12/17/give-google-a-break/comment-page-1/#comment-62</link>
		<dc:creator>Give Google a break &#124; Open Source Geek&#160;&#124;&#160;Open Hacking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 21:10:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://opensourcegeek.org/?p=291#comment-62</guid>
		<description>[...] the original here:  Give Google a break &#124; Open Source Geek    This entry was posted on Thursday, December 17th, 2009 at 12:46 pm and is filed under Linux, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the original here:  Give Google a break | Open Source Geek    This entry was posted on Thursday, December 17th, 2009 at 12:46 pm and is filed under Linux, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Wordpress Auto Upgrade by Wordpress Auto Upgrade &#124; Open Source Geek WP Air</title>
		<link>http://opensourcegeek.org/2009/12/16/wordpress-auto-upgrade/comment-page-1/#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>Wordpress Auto Upgrade &#124; Open Source Geek WP Air</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 04:36:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://opensourcegeek.org/?p=294#comment-60</guid>
		<description>[...] Excerpt from: Wordpress Auto Upgrade &#124; Open Source Geek [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Excerpt from: Wordpress Auto Upgrade | Open Source Geek [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hypervisor Shootout by NetStorming &#187; Hypervisors review</title>
		<link>http://opensourcegeek.org/2009/11/23/hypervisor-shootout/comment-page-1/#comment-58</link>
		<dc:creator>NetStorming &#187; Hypervisors review</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 19:18:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://opensourcegeek.org/?p=266#comment-58</guid>
		<description>[...] compartir con ustedes un post en OpenSource Geek que hace un excelente review sobre algunos hypervisors, con muy buenas fundamentaciones y buscando características que todos solemos exigir en una [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] compartir con ustedes un post en OpenSource Geek que hace un excelente review sobre algunos hypervisors, con muy buenas fundamentaciones y buscando características que todos solemos exigir en una [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hypervisor Shootout by Leandro</title>
		<link>http://opensourcegeek.org/2009/11/23/hypervisor-shootout/comment-page-1/#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>Leandro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 19:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://opensourcegeek.org/?p=266#comment-57</guid>
		<description>Excelente review! I use KVM as my main virtualization platform for non-production systems. At work we use Xen but we&#039;re evaluating new platforms with better tools (as it&#039;s just paravirtualized Xen, not XenServer).

I&#039;ve never heard of ProxMox before but it sound really cool. I will give it a shoot and let you know what I think of it.

Congratulations again!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excelente review! I use KVM as my main virtualization platform for non-production systems. At work we use Xen but we&#8217;re evaluating new platforms with better tools (as it&#8217;s just paravirtualized Xen, not XenServer).</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve never heard of ProxMox before but it sound really cool. I will give it a shoot and let you know what I think of it.</p>
<p>Congratulations again!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hypervisor Shootout by Imran Chaudhry</title>
		<link>http://opensourcegeek.org/2009/11/23/hypervisor-shootout/comment-page-1/#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>Imran Chaudhry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 08:33:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://opensourcegeek.org/?p=266#comment-54</guid>
		<description>Great write-up and thanks for following up your previous posting on virt technology. We&#039;re currently evaluating several virt technologies so this is valuable info for us. I&#039;d heard of KVM of course, and OpenVZ kinda vaguely but ProxMox seems to have brought the two together. I did not hear about ProxMox until reading your post. I&#039;m gonna add ProxMox added to the bunch we&#039;re currently evaluating. One thing, the screenshot here appears to show that snapshots via web interface is possible: http://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Backup_-_Restore_-_Live_Migration - is this true? 

BTW a Debian developer who has recently joined our company has been waxing lyrical about KVM and I&#039;m thinking it is now _the_ way to go for future Linux-based virt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great write-up and thanks for following up your previous posting on virt technology. We&#8217;re currently evaluating several virt technologies so this is valuable info for us. I&#8217;d heard of KVM of course, and OpenVZ kinda vaguely but ProxMox seems to have brought the two together. I did not hear about ProxMox until reading your post. I&#8217;m gonna add ProxMox added to the bunch we&#8217;re currently evaluating. One thing, the screenshot here appears to show that snapshots via web interface is possible: <a href="http://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Backup_-_Restore_-_Live_Migration" rel="nofollow">http://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Backup_-_Restore_-_Live_Migration</a> &#8211; is this true? </p>
<p>BTW a Debian developer who has recently joined our company has been waxing lyrical about KVM and I&#8217;m thinking it is now _the_ way to go for future Linux-based virt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hypervisor Shootout by uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://opensourcegeek.org/2009/11/23/hypervisor-shootout/comment-page-1/#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>uberVU - social comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 22:48:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://opensourcegeek.org/?p=266#comment-51</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Twitter by opensourcegeek: New blog post: Hypervisor Shootout http://opensourcegeek.org/2009/11/23/hypervisor-shootout/...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Twitter by opensourcegeek: New blog post: Hypervisor Shootout <a href="http://opensourcegeek.org/2009/11/23/hypervisor-shootout/.." rel="nofollow">http://opensourcegeek.org/2009/11/23/hypervisor-shootout/..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on VMware Left Me by Imran-UK</title>
		<link>http://opensourcegeek.org/2009/11/10/vmware-left-me/comment-page-1/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>Imran-UK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 21:55:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://opensourcegeek.org/?p=260#comment-46</guid>
		<description>We use Xen at work, it&#039;s pretty good and very efficient. The guests run very fast with little or no overhead. If you want a GUI though to manage it then I&#039;m not the guy to advise other than to probably look at the Citrix Xen product. We use Xen in a hosted environment and manage it and the guests with the command line. It&#039;s totally manageable that way though. 
If you hang out on the #xen IRC Freenode channel you become aware of some extremely cool stuff going on in Xen - there is a project called Remus that provides failover for a Xen guest - not only is the disc kept in sync but the memory, TCP conns, everything! It&#039;s aim is to failover as if nothing happended to the original guest. It&#039;s just been merged into mainline Xen and will be in the next release.
I keep hearing good things about KVM - it&#039;s big advantage over Xen is that it&#039;s implemented as a kernel module - thus your KVM machine gets all the mainline kernel updates too. Xen requires a specialized kernel and thus the guests need to be patched to run with that kernel. 
Anyhow, keep us updated on which you go with and why - oh, and describe the GUI management stuff too!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We use Xen at work, it&#8217;s pretty good and very efficient. The guests run very fast with little or no overhead. If you want a GUI though to manage it then I&#8217;m not the guy to advise other than to probably look at the Citrix Xen product. We use Xen in a hosted environment and manage it and the guests with the command line. It&#8217;s totally manageable that way though.<br />
If you hang out on the #xen IRC Freenode channel you become aware of some extremely cool stuff going on in Xen &#8211; there is a project called Remus that provides failover for a Xen guest &#8211; not only is the disc kept in sync but the memory, TCP conns, everything! It&#8217;s aim is to failover as if nothing happended to the original guest. It&#8217;s just been merged into mainline Xen and will be in the next release.<br />
I keep hearing good things about KVM &#8211; it&#8217;s big advantage over Xen is that it&#8217;s implemented as a kernel module &#8211; thus your KVM machine gets all the mainline kernel updates too. Xen requires a specialized kernel and thus the guests need to be patched to run with that kernel.<br />
Anyhow, keep us updated on which you go with and why &#8211; oh, and describe the GUI management stuff too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
