<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: VMware Left Me</title>
	<atom:link href="http://opensourcegeek.org/2009/11/10/vmware-left-me/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://opensourcegeek.org/2009/11/10/vmware-left-me/</link>
	<description>Days in the life of an aging, open source geek</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 19:19:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Imran-UK</title>
		<link>http://opensourcegeek.org/2009/11/10/vmware-left-me/comment-page-1/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>Imran-UK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 21:55:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://opensourcegeek.org/?p=260#comment-46</guid>
		<description>We use Xen at work, it&#039;s pretty good and very efficient. The guests run very fast with little or no overhead. If you want a GUI though to manage it then I&#039;m not the guy to advise other than to probably look at the Citrix Xen product. We use Xen in a hosted environment and manage it and the guests with the command line. It&#039;s totally manageable that way though. 
If you hang out on the #xen IRC Freenode channel you become aware of some extremely cool stuff going on in Xen - there is a project called Remus that provides failover for a Xen guest - not only is the disc kept in sync but the memory, TCP conns, everything! It&#039;s aim is to failover as if nothing happended to the original guest. It&#039;s just been merged into mainline Xen and will be in the next release.
I keep hearing good things about KVM - it&#039;s big advantage over Xen is that it&#039;s implemented as a kernel module - thus your KVM machine gets all the mainline kernel updates too. Xen requires a specialized kernel and thus the guests need to be patched to run with that kernel. 
Anyhow, keep us updated on which you go with and why - oh, and describe the GUI management stuff too!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We use Xen at work, it&#8217;s pretty good and very efficient. The guests run very fast with little or no overhead. If you want a GUI though to manage it then I&#8217;m not the guy to advise other than to probably look at the Citrix Xen product. We use Xen in a hosted environment and manage it and the guests with the command line. It&#8217;s totally manageable that way though.<br />
If you hang out on the #xen IRC Freenode channel you become aware of some extremely cool stuff going on in Xen &#8211; there is a project called Remus that provides failover for a Xen guest &#8211; not only is the disc kept in sync but the memory, TCP conns, everything! It&#8217;s aim is to failover as if nothing happended to the original guest. It&#8217;s just been merged into mainline Xen and will be in the next release.<br />
I keep hearing good things about KVM &#8211; it&#8217;s big advantage over Xen is that it&#8217;s implemented as a kernel module &#8211; thus your KVM machine gets all the mainline kernel updates too. Xen requires a specialized kernel and thus the guests need to be patched to run with that kernel.<br />
Anyhow, keep us updated on which you go with and why &#8211; oh, and describe the GUI management stuff too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
